笑傲江湖

济南印发餐厨垃圾管理规定：餐厨垃圾收运单位未按时收运，最高罚款三万元_我的网站

低俗怪谈

一 |

Shipping containers are loaded and unloaded onto ships at the Port of Los Angeles, California, on July 9, 2025. US President Donald Trump has sent letters to multiple countries dictating new US tariff rates on their countries' imports to the USA. Photo: VCG

Shipping containers are loaded and unloaded onto ships at the Port of Los Angeles, California, on July 9, 2025. Photo: VCG
When even major US allies and trading partners are swept into Washington's alleged China-linked transshipment network, is the US still cracking down on its so-called illegal tariff evasion, or is it raising its "small yard, high fence" higher and tighten it further by wielding its tariff stick and extending tariff controls across normal global supply chains?
The White House on Thursday released a report identifying roughly 40 economies as participants in what it calls a "Shadow Transshipment Network", alleging that Chinese goods are being routed through third countries to evade higher US tariffs. The list stretches across Asia, Europe and the Americas and includes some of Washington's closest allies and largest trading partners.
Chinese experts said the report is partly aimed at defending Washington's tariff policy by shifting responsibility for its weakened impact onto other economies, while also pressuring them to follow US trade and origin rules. In effect, the US is trying to extend its unilateral trade restrictions beyond its own borders and deeper into global supply chains, they said.
Build 'higher fence'
The 25-page report claims that US import sourcing saw a "substantial reallocation" after the 2018 tariffs, as China's direct share declined and imports from identified transshipment economies rose. It alleges that some goods were routed through lower-tariff jurisdictions, where minor processing, relabeling, repackaging, re-invoicing or paperwork changes were used to create the appearance of a new national origin.
However, the report itself acknowledges that alleged transshipment risks in several major economies are "embedded within broad legitimate trade flows." It also admitted that the post-2018 shift in US imports "does not establish" that all displaced Chinese trade was illegally transshipped and partly reflected "legitimate changes in production, investment, and sourcing."
False declarations of origin or simple repackaging can amount to tariff circumvention, but investing overseas, building factories abroad or sourcing components across borders are legitimate forms of supply-chain adjustment, experts said.
One purpose of the report is to portray Washington's tariff policy as effective while attributing its diminished impact to the responses of other economies, Zhou Mi, a researcher at the Chinese Academy of International Trade and Economic Cooperation, told the Global Times.
This allows Washington to shift responsibility onto other economies and put itself in a more favorable position in shaping the narrative around its tariff policy, Zhou said.
Cui Fan, a professor at the University of International Business and Economics, told the Global Times that US rules for determining country of origin are not fully aligned with those used by other economies. The latest move could pressure other countries to adopt US standards, but Cui said such an approach is unlikely to work.
"Countries formulate their rules of origin based on a range of factors, including the scale and technological conditions of their own industries," Cui said. "Industrial structures and the global division of labor cannot be reshaped simply through pressure from one country."
Harmonization of rules of origin - applying the same rules across countries regardless of purpose - "would facilitate the flow of international trade," according to WTO on its website.
It has also warned that misuse of such rules may turn them into "a trade policy instrument" rather than merely a device supporting other trade policy measures, according to WTO.
Washington was pursuing hegemonic politics and unilateral bullying in the economic and trade sphere under the guise of "reciprocity", a spokesperson for China's Ministry of Commerce said when commenting on the US use of tariffs to pressure other countries into restricting economic and trade cooperation with China.
Disrupting global supply chains

Cui said production and trade networks linking China with South Korea, Europe and other economies have taken shape over years of market-driven specialization. By lowering production and logistics costs and improving efficiency, these networks have benefited businesses and consumers across participating economies.
"The real challenge facing global trade today is not so-called illegal transshipment, but the continued damage that unilateralism and trade protectionism are inflicting on the multilateral trading system," Cui added.
Since returning to office, the Trump administration has made tariffs a centerpiece of its trade policy, rolling out sweeping "reciprocal tariffs" and other broad duties that have drawn widespread criticism at home and abroad. On Thursday, Washington announced new Section 232 tariffs on drones and their parts and components, further expanding the range of products subject to US tariffs.
US tariffs have themselves pushed companies to reconfigure supply chains. Washington is now citing those very adjustments as evidence of circumvention, effectively using the market fallout from its own tariff policy to justify further trade restrictions, Chinese experts noted.
International trade is based on mutual benefit, and sovereign countries have the legitimate right to conduct economic and trade cooperation independently, Cui said. "No country should interfere with normal global trade simply to advance its own unilateral interests."
The report broadens its scrutiny beyond routing and documentation to include China-origin inputs or components, Chinese ownership or financing, relationships with Chinese suppliers or manufacturers, China-based production steps and China-origin routing histories.
Analysts believed the latest move is more than simply making the existing "high fence" higher. By trying to bring more economies and a larger portion of global supply chains within the reach of US tariff enforcement, Washington attempted to make the "yard" itself much bigger.
Cui warned that sustained US pressure to reshape normal trade and supply-chain links could fragment mature regional production networks, and reduce the efficiency of global resource allocation, with the impact extending far beyond China-US trade given the wide range of economies named in the report.
Zhou noted that companies would be forced to redesign supply chains to manage rising policy risks, adding costs that could feed back into the US through higher inflation while creating broader frictions and instability for global trade.
。济南印发餐厨垃圾管理规定：餐厨垃圾收运单位未按时收运，最高罚款三万元

　　近日，济南市人民政府网站发布《济南市餐厨垃圾管理规定》。根据规定，餐厨垃圾产生单位未按照规定分类收集、存放餐厨垃圾的，由综合行政执法部门责令限期改正;拒不改正的，处一千元以上一万元以下的罚款。餐厨垃圾收运单位未按照环境卫生作业标准、规范，在规定的时间内收运餐厨垃圾的，责令限期改正，并可处五千元以上三万元以下的罚款。　　随着经济社会快速发展，城市规模不断扩大，餐饮行业持续发展，餐饮垃圾产生量与日俱增，餐饮垃圾管理问题成为城市管理面临的重要问题。《济南市餐饮垃圾管理规定》于2005年11月28日经市政府第30次常务会议审议通过，2006年7月1日起施行。该规定施行以来，有力规范了我市餐饮垃圾管理工作。

二 | 随着上位法的调整变化，特别是2007年《城市生活垃圾管理办法》对餐厨垃圾管理作出规定，以及《中华人民共和国生态环境法典》颁布出台，对生活垃圾、厨余垃圾等作出系统规范。

三 | 为维护法制统一，根据生态环境法典涉及的政府规章集中清理工作安排，需要根据上位法对《济南市餐饮垃圾管理规定》进行修改。　　为扎实推进此项立法工作，市城管局、市司法局结合工作实际，深入开展立法调研，扎实做好立法起草、审查等各环节工作，通过公开征求意见、召开专家论证会等多种方式，充分吸纳市政府法律顾问及社会各界的意见建议。

四 | 经多轮修改完善，形成修正草案后，完成部门会签、公平竞争审查，按程序提请市政府常务会议、市委常委会会议审议通过，形成《济南市餐厨垃圾管理规定》。　　《济南市餐厨垃圾管理规定》规范餐厨垃圾的定义。根据《城市生活垃圾管理办法》(建设部令第 157 号)《山东省餐厨废弃物管理办法》(山东省人民政府令第274号)，进一步细化餐厨垃圾的范围，完善餐厨垃圾的定义。《规定》所称餐厨垃圾，是指居民家庭生活以外，从事餐饮服务、集体供餐、食品生产加工等活动的单位和个人(以下简称餐厨垃圾产生单位)，在生产经营过程中产生的食物残余、食品加工废料、废弃食用油脂及油水混合物等废弃物。　　实行收运处理市场准入和公开机制。餐厨垃圾收运处理活动依法实行许可管理，根据生态环境法典关于餐厨垃圾交由具备资质条件的单位进行无害化处理，以及通过招标等方式选择具备条件收运、处理单位等规定并向社会公布，防止无序收运和非法处理。　　实行餐厨垃圾全链条规范管理。产生源头倡导文明饮食、源头减量，落实分类收集和容器管理要求;收运处理环节明确定时定点、密闭运输、收运间隔等作业规范，推行服务协议制度，严格管控废弃油脂，实现来源可溯、去向可查、责任可究，守牢食品安全和生态环境底线。　　实行餐厨垃圾产生、收运、处理联单制度。明确施行餐厨垃圾产生、收运、处理联单制度，通过管理台账记录餐厨垃圾的来源、种类、数量、去向等，实现全过程可追溯。　　完善社会监督和法律责任体系。城市管理部门公布举报投诉电话，及时受理相关投诉，接受社会监督;针对未按要求分类收集存放、未按标准规范收运、违反环保规定、将废弃食用油脂加工后作为食用油销售使用等行为，分别由综合行政执法、生态环境、市场监管等部门依法处罚，构成犯罪的依法追究刑事责任。　　在修改内容方面，《规定》调整适用范围。

五 | 从本市建成区内餐饮垃圾的产生、收运、处理及其相关的管理活动适用《济南市餐饮垃圾管理规定》，县(市)参照执行，修改为全市统一适用。　　删除关于废水排放的要求及处罚条款。餐饮垃圾产生单位产生的是生活污水，废水的表述与生态环境法典中废水的表述不契合，根据《城镇排水与污水处理条例》第二十一条有关要求，餐饮单位按照要求办理污水排入排水管网许可证并按照污水排入排水管网许可证的要求排放污水即可，且生活污水不属于餐厨垃圾，不在调整范围内。

六 | 　　规范废弃食用油脂加工后作为食用油销售或者使用的处罚条款。将废弃食用油脂加工后作为食用油销售或使用的，根据《中华人民共和国食品安全法》统一为由市场监管部门进行查处。

七 | 　　调整与生态环境法典冲突的处罚条款。根据生态环境法典《城市生活垃圾管理办法》等上位法，调整第十六条处罚金额，并删除与生态环境法典处罚范围不一致的处罚条款。具体而言，餐厨垃圾产生单位未按照规定分类收集、存放餐厨垃圾的，由综合行政执法部门责令限期改正;拒不改正的，处一千元以上一万元以下的罚款;餐厨垃圾收运单位未按照环境卫生作业标准、规范，在规定的时间内收运餐厨垃圾的，责令限期改正，并可处五千元以上三万元以下的罚款。